General Implementation April 1998
Copyright © 1998 by Institute for Clinical Systems Integration
The information contained in this web site, including the ICSI Health Care Guidelines ("ICSI Guidelines"), is intended primarily for health professionals and the following expert audiences:
Neither the ICSI Guidelines nor any other information in this web site should be construed as medical advice or medical opinion related to any specific facts or circumstances. If you are not one of the expert audiences listed above you are urged to consult a health care professional regarding your own situation and any specific medical questions you may have. In addition, you should seek assistance from a health care professional in interpreting the materials in this web site and applying the materials in your individual case.
The ICSI Guidelines contained in this web site are designed to assist clinicians by providing an analytical framework for the evaluation and treatment of patients, and are not intended either to replace a clinician's judgment or to establish a protocol for all patients with a particular condition. An ICSI Guideline rarely will establish the only approach to a problem.
The ICSI Guidelines may be downloaded by any individual or organization. Copies of the ICSI Guidelines may be distributed by any organization to the organization's employees but, except as provided below, may not be distributed outside of the organization without the prior written consent of the Institute for Clinical Systems Integration, Inc. If the ICSI Guidelines are downloaded by a legally constituted medical group, they may be used by the medical group in any of the following ways:
Population
of Interest
Adults and mature adolescents.
Possible measure of accomplishing this aim:
Possible measure of accomplishing this aim:
Possible measure of accomplishing this aim:
Possible measure of accomplishing this aim:
Clinical Algorithms & Annotations
1. Community Intervention
2. Establish Tobacco
Use
3. Documentation
5. Reinforce Nonuse
6. When Did the Patient Last Use Tobacco?
8. Patient Wants Extra Help in Staying
Quit?
9. Congratulate
on Quitting
10. Assistance in Staying
Quit
11. Patients
Who Last Used Tobacco Within the Last Month
12. Congratulate
on Quitting/ Encourage a Follow-up
14. Assessing
a User's Interest in Quitting
15. Patients
not Ready to Consider Quitting
17. Patients
Interested in Quitting in 1-6 Months
19. Discuss
NRT; Give Self-Help Material; Counseling
20. Patients
Interested in Quitting in 1 Month
The work group urges ICSI member medical groups, clinicians, HealthPartners, and employers to actively intervene within their community to reduce tobacco use. The establishment of smoke-free public spaces, limiting youth access to tobacco, restrictions on advertising, counteradvertising and increasing economic disincentives to tobacco use are among the most effective community actions to be supported.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
Adults who have not used tobacco for at least 6 months and who have an easily visible mark on their chart to that effect should have usage reassessed at every health supervision visit.
Everyone without a tobacco use mark on the chart or those with a mark indicating use within the past 6 months should be asked at nearly every visit about current use and the answer documented for the provider. This frequency of use assessment should be established as a clinic policy and should be done by a staff person, preferably the one who rooms the patient.
The two most common ways to indicate tobacco use status are with an appropriate label on the chart or with a vital sign in the progress notes.
Adolescents should have usage reassessed at nearly every visit, regardless of whether there is a chart notation of non-use, due to their risk of beginning tobacco use at any time.
Tobacco cessation is particularly important during pregnancy. For more information, see the ICSI Preterm Birth Prevention and Routine Prenatal Care guidelines. We recommend that clinics have a particularly consistent identification and cessation program for pregnant women and preconception visits.
Tobacco cessation is also very important in those individuals with heart disease or other risk factors for heart disease. (See also other ICSI guidelines such as the Stable Coronary Artery Disease, Treatment of Lipid Disorder in Adults, and Hypertension Diagnosis and Treatment guidelines.)
The rest of the algorithm is intended for the provider.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
All conversations with tobacco-users should be documented, either in the progress note or on a special card or flow sheet if a clinic uses that approach. This documentation should include the user's attitude toward quitting and any quitting plans agreed upon. The documentation can be very brief.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
If time permits, it is helpful to compliment former tobacco-users. These former users are considered to be in the Maintenance stage once they have been quit for at least 6 months.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
6. When Did the Patient Last Use Tobacco?
Although the usual definition of a user is one who uses tobacco daily, it would be ideal to classify any individual using tobacco with any frequency as a user.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
8. Patient Wants Extra Help in Staying Quit?
A former user who is having some trouble staying quit may want or need more help than the provider can supply in the 2-3 minutes available to discuss this topic. Common difficulties include weight gain, stress, withdrawal symptoms, or social/habit/psychological needs.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
The first months after quitting are the transition between the Action and Maintenance stages. These months (especially the first 1-2 weeks), when one is at the highest risk for relapse, are the most challenging. Encourage the patient to avoid temptations to use tobacco again. Smoking cessation often takes 3-4 attempts before long-term success is achieved.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
10. Assistance in Staying Quit
Counseling can be done by the provider or, preferably, by other staff, and should be designed to help quitters problem-solve any of the difficulties referred to in Annotation #8.
The equivalent of counseling can also be achieved by referring a user to groups or other resources. It should be recognized, though, that most quitters are unwilling to attend such groups, especially if they are separate from the clinic.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
11. Patients Who Last Used Tobacco Within the Last Month
Those who have quit using tobacco within the last month (particularly within the past week) are at a very high risk for returning to the habit. Reinforcement and follow-up can be crucial during this period.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
12. Congratulate on Quitting/ Encourage a Follow-up
A follow-up means a mailed or (preferably) telephoned expression of support and willingness to help. The timing of follow-ups should be discussed with the patient; generally, the follow-up should come at the time when it will be most needed or wanted. Follow-ups can be handled by office staff.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
14. Assessing a User's Interest in Quitting
Assessment of interest in quitting and timing of that interest should be done after the main reasons for the visit have been addressed, and should precede any advice about quitting. This allows a 1-3 minute tobacco discussion accommodating both the user's needs and the provider's time limits.
It is recognized that this discussion may not be possible or appropriate at each visit. The goal should be to discuss tobacco cessation at nearly every visit.
Remember that progress from one stage of readiness to quit to the next is as valuable as a quit attempt.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
15. Patients not Ready to Consider Quitting
A user not ready to consider quitting within the next 6 months is called a precontemplator, and is helped most when a provider avoids confrontation while conveying both the message that quitting is important and the desire to be helpful when the user is ready to consider quitting. A simple informational pamphlet about the problems attending tobacco use and an expression of the provider's desire to be helpful are far more productive than an attempt to scare or argue unwilling users into quitting.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
17. Patients Interested in Quitting in 1-6 Months
The contemplator is considering quitting within the next 1-6 months. Contemplators are accepting of supportive and respectful urging to quit and encouragement to start thinking about a serious plan for doing so. Persuasive written, audio, or video information about the pros and cons of quitting may be appropriate for contemplators.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
19. Discuss NRT; Give Self-Help Material; Counseling
Nicotine Reduction Therapy (NRT) can be very helpful to selected patients. It is most effective if certain conditions are true; see the NRT box on the algorithm page for those conditions.
If NRT is utilized, it will be most effective when accompanied by a follow-up program which consists of behavior change counseling before the quit attempt. Behavior counseling should continue at least monthly after the quit date. Both individual and group follow-up programs are effective. Although both pregnancy and cardiovascular disease are described as contraindications for use of NRT, there is preliminary evidence of safety in these conditions and it is clearly more safe than the continued smoking which is a major preventable risk.
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
20. Patients Interested in Quitting in 1 Month
Users in the preparation stage are ready to attempt to quit in the next month. They will want to quit on their own, but will be pleased to receive some specific support from their provider. That support can be highly effective for these users.
It is always appropriate to request the user to set a quit date within the next 1-3 weeks, to provide self-help information or suggestions, and (most importantly) to encourage the patient to accept some form of follow-up soon after the quit date. (See Annotation #10.)
Back to Contents
Back to Algorithm Annotation List
Work Group Leader
Leif I. Solberg, MD, HealthPartners
Cardiology
Thomas E. Kottke, MD, Mayo Clinic
Family Practice
Donald A. Pine, MD, HealthSystem Minnesota
Michael Schoenleber, MD, HealthPartners
Health Education
Jane A. Norstrom, Institute for Research & Education
Internal Medicine
David Klevan, MD, HealthPartners
Leif I. Solberg, MD, HealthPartners
Nursing
Joanne Kellan, RN, HealthPartners
Ob/Gyn Nurse Practitioner
Renee Compo, RN, CNP, HealthPartners
Pediatrics
Susan Asch, MD, Stillwater Medical Group
Measurement Advisor
Leif I. Solberg, MD, HealthPartners
BHCAG Representative
Sandra Dahl, Honeywell, Inc.
Facilitator
Chris Schroeder, RN, ICSI
Document Drafted | Jul - Sep 1993 |
Critical Review Period | Sep - Oct 1993 |
Revision/Approval | Nov - Dec 1993 |
Pilot Implementation Period | Dec 1993 - Mar 1994 |
Revision/Approval | Mar - May 1994 |
General Implementation (First Cycle) | May 1994 - Aug 1995 |
Revision/Approval | Sep - Nov 1995 |
General Implementation (Second Cycle) | Dec 1995 - Aug 1996 |
Revision/Approval | Sep 1996 - Jan 1997 |
General Implementation (Third Cycle) | Feb - Sep 1997 |
Revision/Approval | Oct 1997 - Mar 1998 |
General Implementation (Fourth Cycle) | Begins Apr 1998 |
Evidence Grading
System
Grade A: Conclusion based on a randomized, controlled
trial that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Grade B: Conclusion based on one of the following study types published
in a peer-reviewed journal
(but
not on a randomized, controlled trial):
Grade C: Conclusion based on one of the following (but not on any studies of the types mentioned above):
Guidelines obtained from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) or other sources, position statements, panel consensus statements from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or elsewhere, review articles, and textbook chapters that cite primary evidence are not assigned a grade because they are not primary evidence. The individual studies cited in such secondary sources can be graded according to the categories presented above.
Other Guidelines Referenced Within This Guideline
Instructions
for Downloading PDF Version of This Guideline
Click here to download the
full version of this Guideline in PDF format. You will need ADOBE Acrobat
reader to view the file. The reader may be found here.
Back to Contents